City of Cape Town stops Brass Bell restaurant from building on beach

Owner wanted a wooden deck to provide people with “an area to sunbathe without getting covered in sea sand”

| By

The Brass Bell in Kalk Bay started construction on the baby beach this week without the necessary approvals, prompting the City of Cape Town to intervene. Photo: Liezl Human

After photos circulated that construction was taking place at the Kalk Bay Tidal Pools that surround the landmark Brass Bell restaurant, the City of Cape Town and the National Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE) made a site visit on Wednesday.

Mayco Member for Spatial Planning and Environment Eddie Andrews said they had requested that the Brass Bell cease all construction for now.

A meeting between the City, the DFFE Oceans and Coasts Environmental Compliance, and the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA) has been scheduled for next week.

PRASA owns the land which is leased to the Brass Bell. The construction took place within 100 metres of the high water mark, which requires environmental authorisation in terms of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA).

The City said that “although the work is within 100m of the high water mark, a determination also has to be made as to whether it is a pre-disturbed footprint or not”.

Tony White, owner of the Brass Bell, said the plan was to build a wooden deck to provide people with “an area to sunbathe without getting covered in sea sand”.

He said he had no idea that approval by PRASA was required. “I now know this to be the case and will not proceed with the deck unless I have formal approval,” said White.

According to Andrews, a coastal by-law adopted in 2020 ensures the right of public access to the entire coastline and coastal amenities.

“The Brass Bell has been formally informed that should they prevent public access they will be served with a legal notice in terms of the Coastal By-law,” said Andrews.

The Brass Bell expanding has been an issue for years according to Faez Poggenpoel, a fifth-generation fisherman in Kalk Bay and representative of the small-scale fishing community. He said the “unrestricted” access is actually the “thin slippery wall of the tidal pools in order to get to the other side”.

“That’s by no means safe access for our people,” he said.

Steve Herbert, a resident, said the community has over the years tried to stop or restrict expansion of the Brass Bell. “And so it’s gone on until there’s virtually nothing left of what was common ground,” said Herbert.

White said that when he first moved to Kalk Bay 55 years ago “the kiddies pool area was in a sorry state of neglect and remained so until I took over the lease”.

Herbert raised concerns about the lease agreements between PRASA and the Brass Bell. The City confirmed that it did not have a copy of the lease.

PRASA spokesperson Andiswa Makanda said when the construction was brought to their attention, a letter was issued to the Brass Bell requesting approval documents. PRASA asked the owner to cease all construction pending the necessary approvals.

A postcard from 1914 shows the Kalk Bay tidal pools and beach before construction in the area. These areas are now almost completely built over. (Since the photo is so old, we understand that it is no longer under copyright.)

Update on 2022-04-05 13:00

This article was updated to include a brief response from PRASA.

TOPICS:  Environment

Next:  Over 3,000 people in Madibeng face eviction

Previous:  Unemployed women turn rubbish dump into netball field for young girls

Write a letter in response to this article


Dear Editor

I attended the protest against the building of a wooden deck on the last little bit of beach left at Kalk Bay pools and was dismayed to see how the public areas have been taken over by the Brass Bell and the two large wooden restaurant structures.
I have no doubt that PRASA owns the original narrow building that is part of the railway station but I very much doubt that they own the beach and pool area. The lease must be obtained from PRASA under the Freedom of Information Act and the illegal structures must be removed so that the beach can be given back to the public. Even if PRASA does own the lease they were not entitled to allow the beach to be taken away from the public.
I wonder whether the Brass Bell is paying market related rent for the area they now occupy?

Dear Editor

The Brass Bell was once an intimate, iconic restaurant where one could be guaranteed live music and fresh fish. In the 80s, you could choose from a selected array of freshly-caught fish and braai it yourself on the open deck over the complimentary fires supplied by the restaurant. Rock music, glorious sea spray and hot charcoal were the order of the day.
Sadly the beauty of those nostalgic days has slowly been destroyed by greed. The unsightly additions that have been constructed, seemingly ad-hoc, jutting out at all angles without care for aesthetics or taste, have become an eyesore. Today the Brass Bell overwhelmingly sprawls itself over a public beach, selfishly obstructing views and restricting access to our beautiful coastline. Who wants to swim in tidal pools or lie suntanning overlooked by tables of diners gawking down at you? Surely enough is enough.

© 2022 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.

We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.