Farm workers march against pesticides
They call on European company to stop exporting EU-banned pesticides to South Africa
About 200 supporters of The Women on Farms Project marched in Paarl on Friday calling on Bayer, a German company, to stop producing and exporting pesticides banned in the European Union to South Africa. Photo: Ashraf Hendricks
- Pesticides that are banned in the EU are being exported to South Africa by pharmaceutical and biotechnology company Bayer.
- Women working on farms in the Boland say the use of these pesticides is making them ill.
- About 200 women marched to Bayer’s offices in Paarl to demand these exports come to a halt.
About 200 women working in agriculture held a protest march in Paarl on Friday, calling on European company Bayer to stop producing and exporting pesticides to South Africa.
Scores of pesticide products that are banned from use in the European Union are being exported to and used in South Africa.
The protesters marched to the head office of Bayer, a German pharmaceutical and biotechnology company. They carried placards that read: “Bayer, your pesticides are deadly” and “End double standards”.
The march was organised by the Women on Farms Project (WFP), an organisation working with women farm workers and farm dwellers in the Western Cape.
The WFP memorandum demands Bayer immediately end production and exports of pesticides currently banned in the EU but sold to South Africa and other developing countries. The memorandum, handed over at Bayer’s office gate to a company representative, stated there are at least 54 such products.
WFP labour programme organiser Katrina Claasen said they get a lot of complaints from women on the farms women about asthma, sinus problems, and skin irritation on their hands after working with crops that had been sprayed with pesticides.
Claasen said she knew male farmworkers who worked with pesticides on a farm in Rawsonville without gloves, face masks, or any protective clothes. She said farmers have a responsibility to send their workers to clinics if they fall ill from possible pesticide exposure.
Mercia Adams, a farm worker who now lives in an informal settlement close to vineyards in Rawsonville, said her 13-year-old daughter fell ill with coughing and sinus problems last year and is now on medication. Adams’s mother also became asthmatic after spraying pesticides in the vineyards for years. “Us farm workers are expected to work and work and work,” she said.
WFP director Colette Solomon said after doing research in 2017 the organisation found that many farm workers and dwellers are exposed to pesticides.
In 2019, the organisation started focusing on getting the South African government to ban 67 pesticides that were already banned in the EU. In May last year women marched in Worcester calling for this ban. In September 2022, the national Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development announced it would start phasing out certain pesticides and ban them completely by June 2024.
Solomon said European governments also have a responsibility to oversee that the companies in their countries ensure they stop the production and export of these pesticides.
Solomon said their new pesticide campaign was about “double standards”. “If pesticides are banned in the European Union because they are so harmful and dangerous … it cannot be right that they are continuously sold in our country,” she said.
GroundUp sent a request for comment to Bayer but did not receive a response at the time of publication.
Mercia Adams from Rawsonville suspects that both her daughter and mother have fallen ill from exposure to pesticides.
Next: Woman “wrongly” sentenced to 16 years for drug dealing must be immediately released
Previous: Loved ones who perished in the Joburg building fire
Letters
Dear Editor
This is a very thorny issue with many layers.
1. What body is responsible for ensuring that products banned in their country of origin, and/or hazardous products are not brought into our country? Whose job is it any way to ensure the country and her people are protected from these threats?
2. Why should people's lives be put at risk while profit is the main driver of the economy? Why should people go to a job that kills them to ensure they put bread on the table to eat and not die from hunger? What kind of a balancing act are we subjecting human lives to? Do we care about our people at all?
3. Where is the moral obligation of firms to ensure that lives come first? Why is a hazardous, banned product shipped to another country to ensure the company does not incur losses on a banned product? Where is the conscience of business owners profiting at the expense of human lives? Is African life so useless that profit comes before lives, without care for their safety? Why is it okay for this banned, hazardous product to be to be brought into Africa?
This is a clear indication that human lives, especially African lives, have no value in certain eyes and clearly nobody cares.
I am grieved. I am a farmer; I use chemicals only if I must. I value human life more than anything. This is just wickedness and shows there's a stronger muscle at play and someone's conscience has been seared.
Africans must take a stand against injustice against their people.
Dear Editor
These ladies intimidated and scolded a single woman representing Bayer. She was left traumatised because of this behaviour.
Barbaric manners, to say the least.
Dear Editor
Bayer produces a host of thoroughly toxic concoctions across the board that are sold/distributed in South Africa in general and these harm our workers, our families and our environment and they need to know that it's unacceptable!
More than that, why does our government allow SA to be a dumping ground for pesticides banned in the EU? Seems to me that African health and lives are not as "precious" as our European counterparts!
© 2023 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.
We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.