UIF online services frozen in court battle

Interim interdict stopped the UIF’s new service provider from rendering IT services

| By

Scores of people queued outside the labour office in Cape Town’s city centre on Wednesday. The UIF’s online portal has been offline for about three weeks. Photos: Mary-Anne Gontsana

  • On 30 August 2024, the Pretoria High Court granted an order which interdicted a new service provider from rendering UIF online portal services.
  • UIF online portals has been down for about three weeks, including uFiling, Unstructured Supplementary Service Data, and Virtual Office.
  • The UIF spokesperson says the previous service provider has been the “biggest headache” during its 19 years with the fund.
  • Extra-measures are being taken at labour centres to deal with claimants in person.

The Unemployment Insurance Fund’s (UIF) online services have been down for weeks. And a court interdict is preventing a new service provider from stepping in.

UIF’s Director for Communications Trevor Hattingh told GroundUp that the fund’s previous service provider has been the “biggest headache” during its 19 years of service.

On Monday, Minister of Employment and Labour Nomakhosazana Meth announced the temporary disruption of UIF online platforms, including uFiling, Unstructured Supplementary Service Data, Virtual Office, as well as the UIF Covid-19 TERS systems.

“On 30 August 2024 the Pretoria High Court handed down a judgment on the matter of a service provider that rendered online portal services of UIF. The court issued an interim interdict preventing, with immediate effect, the new service provider from rendering services for the UIF online portal,” read the statement.

Hattingh said the contract with the previous service provider ended on 18 August. Instead of renewing the contract, UIF sought the services of a new contractor.

“The former service provider is alleging in their court papers, among other things, that without their services we would not be able to pay South Africans,” said Hattingh.

“The [old service provider] says that without their system – the uFiling portal — we would not be able to capture, adjudicate and pay people. But the payment and adjudication system is separate from their uFiling system. So, they lied in their papers. This is all a tactic to create a panic in South Africa,” said Hattingh.

The old service provider had also asked to be granted an extension, he said.

GroundUp has not had an opportunity yet to investigate Hattingh’s claims. It also remains unclear to us why the system was down weeks before the court interdict.

According to Hattingh the biggest issue they’ve had has been with uFiling, which is linked to the Virtual Office system.

“These are both offline now. These are the systems that came with the former service provider that has interdicted us.”

“They have been providing us with online maintenance support for 19 years. And for 19 years our people have been frustrated; for 19 years we have had the biggest headache,” said Hattingh.

On Thursday, the uFiling homepage still had a “Scheduled Maintenance” message up, alerting users that the system is offline and advising them to visit their “nearest labour centre to access UIF services”.

“Why would a service provider whose contract is coming to an end, come and force us? …. We have had enough problems. We don’t want [the old service provider] anymore. We’ve gone through an open tender which has been through the necessary processes. They applied together with other service providers and someone else got the job this time around,” said Hattingh.

Despite the online system being offline, Hattingh said provisions had been made to ensure “all hands-on decks” at all labour offices.

The UIF’s online portal systems has been offline for weeks.

Scores queue outside labour office but appear to be served quickly

The labour office on Plein Street in Cape Town was busier than usual on Wednesday. We saw people being ushered to stand in three lines. One line had about 30 women holding small babies, some wrapped in thick blankets. A second line was for returning claimants, and the third had about 45 first-time claimants.

Sinazo Vele, from Khayelitsha, was holding her three-month-old daughter. She was on maternity leave and was there to claim her UIF.

“I got here around 11am, but it looks like the queues are moving swiftly, so I do not anticipate that I will be standing here for a long time,” said Vele.

Inside the office, the queues of people were orderly, with some claimants sitting on benches. Most of the service points had staff.

Hattingh said that where needed, they were considering extending working hours at some of the department’s 126 labour centres across the country to ensure that people are helped.

“This uFiling was so complicated that now that it’s not there, we are operating so much better. Maybe this whole thing was a blessing in disguise,” said Hattingh.

He said a team had been tasked to work on the uFiling system to get the portal operating as soon as possible.

TOPICS:  Labour Unemployment

Next:  Mike Ngulube’s desperate search for his baby’s body

Previous:  Eskom office closure in Mpumalanga leaves customers frustrated

Write a letter in response to this article

Letters

Dear Editor

I'm not happy about the online services not working. I have been to my nearest labour office for seven days, including today, without being helped. I pay R50 a day for taxi fare! Please bring this online services to work as soon as possible - your employees are not working either and fail to help us.

© 2024 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.

We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.