Social development scandal: Last three suspended officials return to work
They were suspended during the term of MEC Mbali Hlophe when the department was in chaos
Huge amounts of money have been wasted by the Gauteng Department of Social Development. Illustration: Lisa Nelson
- Thirteen officials in the Gauteng Department of Social Development were suspended in a “crackdown on corruption” from September 2023 to January 2024.
- Ten of the officials returned to work in July and the last three have now also returned to work. None faced disciplinary hearings.
- The suspensions occurred during the chaotic leadership of the social development department by MEC Mbali Hlophe and head of department Matilda Gasela. Gasela left in April amid corruption allegations. Hlophe lost her position after the May elections.
The last three of 13 Gauteng Department of Social Development (GDSD) officials suspended during an alleged “crackdown on corruption” returned to work last week.
The three were suspended on full pay in September last year. Like the other ten officials who were all suspended on full pay and who returned to work at the end of July, they were charged but never faced disciplinary hearings.
At the time of their suspension, the department was under the leadership of MEC Mbali Hlophe and Head of Department Matilda Gasela. Gasela left in April amid allegations of corruption when her contract was not renewed.
Hlophe was removed from the ANC-led Gauteng provincial government’s Cabinet after the May elections. On her watch, many organisations providing critical services to vulnerable people in the province were devastated by the department’s failure to allocate funding and pay subsidies.
The suspended officials were told that even though they had returned to work, they could still face disciplinary hearings, says a GDSD source, who asked not to be identified as they are not allowed to speak to journalists.
Initially, they were suspended because of a 2016 forensic report. But later they were told that it was because of a much more recent report by forensic audit firm FSG.
Many of the FSG report’s findings were successfully challenged by the non-profit organisations named in it. It also did not support or prove any of Hlophe’s allegations of corruption by any officials and merely found that there may have been “administrative mistakes” on the part of some of them.
Chaos under Hlophe
During Hlophe’s term, GDSD was racked by numerous controversies, which resulted in a funding crisis for many non-profit organisations dependent on government funding. Some of them closed down or retrenched staff and cut back services to keep their doors open.
This led to an apology by Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi, who was forced to intervene to try to resolve catastrophic funding failures by the GDSD.
This was because of the pre-election furore over Hlophe’s handling of the Social Development portfolio, which saw tens of millions of rands in deviations from supply chain management processes. The deviations were a bid to spend its budget by the end of the financial year.
Also on her watch, hundreds of homeless people in Tshwane shelters were abandoned after the department stopped paying an organisation to provide them services. GroundUp has reliably learned that the new MEC, Faith Mazibuko, has instructed the department to pay the organisation.
Children’s centres shut down and Johannesburg’s biggest foodbank was forced to close its doors when its payments were delayed. GDSD also admitted that the appointment of controversial audit firm Open Water Advanced Risk Solutions to probe a school uniforms programme, at a cost of R8.5-million, was irregular.
The department spent tens of millions of rands on dozens of paid-for online and print advertorials to try and repair Hlophe’s battered image.
Mazibuko’s spokesperson Lebogang Lukhele previously told GroundUp that the suspensions were an internal matter, and she could not disclose any details to the media.
Spokesperson for the department, Motsamai Motlhaolwa, read questions sent to him via WhatsApp but did not respond.
Next: Can you spell the word that decided this Joburg Spelling Bee competition?
Previous: Ten years on and households still rely on water trucks
© 2024 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.
We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.