Court orders Gauteng Education Department to fix school where learner was electrocuted

Maubrey Mahudu died at Geluksdal Secondary School in 2017 when she touched a metal door frame

| By

The Johannesburg High Court has told the Gauteng Education Department to fix infrastructure at a Brakpan school where a learner was electrocuted. Photo: Brian Turner via Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

  • The Gauteng education department has been given 15 days to tell the Johannesburg High Court what will be done to fix infrastructure at Geluksdal Secondary School in Brakpan, where a teenager was electrocuted in 2017.
  • Maubrey Mahudu died when she touched a metal door frame.
  • Her parents, who are suing the department for negligence, have sought orders against the MEC, the department and the school to make sure the infrastructure is repaired.
  • The draft order handed in by their lawyers was unopposed and made an order of court by Judge Marcus Senyatsi.

The Johannesburg High Court has given the Gauteng Department of Education 15 days to say what it will do to fix infrastructure at Geluksdal Secondary School in Brakpan, where a teenager was electrocuted in 2017.

Matric pupil Maubrey Mahudu died instantly from electrocution when she touched the metal door frame of a mobile classroom during a storm in January 2017. She was said to have removed her shoes to keep them dry because the area was flooded because of inadequate stormwater drainage.

She would have turned 18 two days later.

The order was granted by Johannesburg High Court Judge Marcus Senyatsi this week.

The teenager’s parents, Deshage Meshak Mahudu and Mpule Gladys Mahudu are suing the provincial education department for R7 million alleging negligence.

They also sought orders against the MEC to make sure that the school infrastructure is repaired, replaced and properly secured so that a tragedy like this never happens again.

They said that despite repeated attempts by their attorneys to ascertain what steps had been taken since their daughter’s death to comply with the recommendations of an investigation report commissioned by the department, they had received no response. “The only reasonable inference is that no steps have been taken whatsoever.”

“For us this matter is of enormous concern. It causes us great distress to think that not only did Maubrey die needlessly, but her death and the investigations have been in vain and have not resulted in other learners being protected.”

The parents said the investigation report had concluded that the principal had reported the issues of stolen wiring, circuit breakers and earth leakage equipment to the department. But these reports “fell through the cracks, because the left hand did not know what the right hand was doing” and each division thought the other was dealing with it.

A draft order was handed into court by their lawyers from Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr, which Judge Senyatsi made an order of court saying he was “in 100% agreement” that a proper case has been made out on the papers. The matter was unopposed.

The judge directed that:

  • The MEC and the school must urgently replace and repair circuit breakers, earth leakage and other electrical equipment at the school;
  • Gauteng education officials in the works inspection department who did not report on the death of the learner be reprimanded;
  • The roles and responsibilities of different officials within the department should be clear to make sure that electrical infrastructure was maintained;
  • Details be given on how security would be improved to prevent repeated theft of life-saving electrical equipment; and
  • Steps be taken to discipline officials who failed to take action after the unsafe infrastructure was reported.

The judge gave the department 15 days to file affidavits to the court accounting for the steps they have taken to comply with their constitutional, statutory and common-law obligations to protect learners against the risk of electrocution.

He ordered that the applicants could then approach the court again for a further order against the department, if necessary.

SECTION27, which was admitted as an amicus curiae in the matter, said it would monitor the situation to ensure that infrastructure problems at the school were resolved speedily to prevent further violations of learners’ rights.

“Throughout the litigation proceedings, government officials have remained silent and have not engaged on this matter. It is disappointing that education officials have remained unreachable about a case surrounding the safety of learners while at school,” said research and advocacy officer Julie Chaskalson.

“Because of the department’s failure to replace life-saving and statutorily required circuit breakers and earth leakage equipment that had been stolen from the school, the learner died of electrocution when she touched the metal doorframe of a mobile classroom in a thunderstorm.

“Despite it being more than five years since the learner passed away, the department has failed to fix the unsafe infrastructure at the school or even engage with stakeholders about plans to fix the infrastructure.”

In its submission to the court, SECTION27 detailed the history of unsafe school infrastructure and the need for better security at schools to prevent equipment such as earth leakage and circuit breakers from being stolen.

SECTION27 also submitted that educational officials at all levels were responsible for, and had a constitutional duty to ensure the safety of learners at school.

TOPICS:  Education

Next:  PRASA dropped by lawyers as billion-rand corruption deal appeal looms

Previous:  Khayelitsha shacks to be electrified at last

© 2022 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.

We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.