Child Support Grant needs to be increased, report finds

Researchers say the grant should be R624 – the food poverty line

| By

A new study by Black Sash found that households dependent on the Child Support Grant (CSG) faced a constant threat of food running out before the end of the month. The CSG is currently inadequate to meet the nutritional needs of children. Archive photo: Kimberley Mutandiro

  • New report from the Black Sash finds the Child Support Grant is not enough.
  • Caregivers often resort to skipping meals or rationing.
  • The grant was increased by 4% to R480 in the 2022 Budget, below annual food inflation.
  • Researchers have called for an increased grant to meet the food poverty line of R624 per person per month.

The Child Support Grant (CSG) should be increased so that children have enough to eat, according to a recent research report commissioned by Black Sash. The report on children, social assistance and food security found that at current levels the grant is not enough.

The report was based on interviews with twelve households in the Western Cape that rely on the grant, and compiled by researchers Dr Chantell Witten of the University of the Free State, Dr Wanga Zembe of the Medical Research Council (MRC), and the Black Sash Research Team.

The CSG is the lowest of all the grants in South Africa. Following finance minister Enoch Godongwana’s budget speech on Wednesday the grant was increased by 4%, from R460 to R480 per month.

According to the December 2021 release of the Consumer Price Index, inflation for food and non-alcoholic beverages was 5.5% year-on-year.

Over 12 million children benefit from the grant.

The grant must cover many basic needs for a child including food, shelter, clothing and education. However, the report found that the inadequate size of the grant is “wide-ranging and debilitating” for children, their caregivers and the households where they live.

The report recommends that the CSG be linked to an objective measure of need, such as the Food Poverty Line, which is currently at R624 per person.

The participants in the study were based in Langa, Mannenberg, Genadendal, Robertson, Moorreesburg, Masiphumelele, and Lavender Hill.

Household sizes ranged from two to 12 people, and the number of CSGs per household ranged from one to eight. None of the caregivers in the study were formally employed.

According to the report, caregivers and their households faced a constant threat of food running out.

Caregivers had to develop strategies to cope when their households risked running out of money or food before month-end. These included skipping one meal a day, or meal rationing, where all household members, including children, have smaller portions of food to eat at mealtimes.

Caregivers also resorted to buying small amounts of the more expensive food – items such as sugar, coffee, powdered milk, and washing powder – so that they only use these items when needed at a cost of about R2 to R3 per teaspoon.

Foods like fresh meat, tinned fish, eggs, milk or yoghurt were seen as a luxury.

During a virtual launch of the report on Thursday, Dr Zembe said that in households where children were of school-going age, most of the grant went towards the costs of attending school.

This led caregivers to make constant trade-offs between food and other essential needs, such as educational costs, electricity and rent.

Zembe said they had found households where the entire grocery budget for the month was R327, mostly where only one grant was being received, and there was no other source of income.

“So, we can think that R327 is not going to afford food that is of good dietary quality. Amongst all the households, hunger was the norm,” she said.

One of the participants, an unemployed mother from Langa, had no other source of income except the grant she received for her four-year-old child. Zembe said that the mother was facing a lot of anxiety about how her child would transition to primary school. The mother said she had been unable to enrol the child at a crèche, since none of the Early Childhood Development centres in Langa cost less than R200 per month. A decision to send her to the crèche would mean that they would be left with R260, said Zembe.

Caregivers were often forced to buy food on credit, or borrow money from relatives to supplement their groceries, according to the report.

Black Sash Paralegal Fieldworker Abigail Peters said caregivers expressed the difficulty and shame that came with needing to borrow money multiple times from friends, family and neighbours.

“The caregivers, when they are borrowing, are asking family, neighbours and friends, but these are already struggling networks. These networks also need to sacrifice to assist the caregivers and this is why the caregivers often feel a sense of shame and embarrassment because they know that the person they are asking money from is also struggling,” said Peters.

Witten said the mothers know that their children need more and better food. However, all that is affordable are “cheap, nutrient-limited, starchy, energy-dense foods” offered on sales, like maize meal and rice.

“These are the food survival packs of the poor with limited fresh fruit and vegetables.”

Witten said they are calling for more access to a basic food basket for children, pro-poor macro policies that ensure that poor people can access better food, and stronger regulatory frameworks that ensure better food options.

TOPICS:  Food security Social Grants

Next:  Khayelitsha hospital staff overwhelmed with cases

Previous:  Cape Town Central Line to return to service in December, says PRASA

Write a letter in response to this article


Dear Editor

We beg for the child support grant to be increased. Children need nutrition, education and clothes. Some of us parents are not working and we depend on the grant to pay for school fees, transport and healthy food. We beg for the increase so that we can keep our little ones healthy!

Dear Editor

So many children are suffering from a lack of nutrition and healthy foods. As I've gone places I've seen how many children don't even have warm clothes or decent shoes to wear during the winter and not even enough to cover them against the sun in warmer weather. Our struggles are real as parents trying to give our children the best upbringing but without enough money we often feel we've failed them. It's heartbreaking to see how the children are forced to change through circumstances and mature before they need to. Even a lot of us applied for the SRD fund but not everyone was lucky to get that as a source of income as well. So we plead for a raise in the child grant please.

Dear Editor

The child support grant should be increased. We can barely afford to buy food, pay school fees, and buy stationery. Whether you collect the grant or not, you have to pay half the school fees immediately and then still buy books. When we take our kids shopping for these things, they deserve a little luxury - especially when they're so small! A little toy or some goodie. How can we afford these things with so little money?

Dear Editor

Why must the taxpayer bear the full brunt of providing for children?

What responsibilities do their parents bear?

If people cannot afford to provide at least partially for their children then they should not have them.

Contraception is free as are abortions - but the mentality that the government (i.e. taxpayers) must provide everything for free leads to children being born into abject poverty which is, in my opinion, child abuse.

Dear Editor

We need to increase the child grant. School fees, clothes and shoes are expensive! And what about if you have a newborn baby? You need nappies and baby milk and clothes but we can't afford them every month. Costs of groceries are increasing too. So what is different about the Foster Care grant? Why are they getting more? They get more than R1,000 and the other children are getting R460. It's not fair. It must be the same.

© 2022 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.

We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.