Deputy principal suspended after probe names him in suicide of 12-year-old Gauteng learner
Three other teachers named in report are still at the school
Sibusiso Mbatha, a 12-year-old learner at Khehlekile Primary School in Thokoza, took his own life in October.
A deputy principal named in a damning report into the suicide of 12-year-old Gauteng learner Sibusiso Mbatha has been suspended. But three other teachers also named in the report are still at the school, including the principal.
Sibusiso, a grade 6 learner at Khehlekile Primary School in Thokoza, died on 23 October.
The results of an investigation by BR Rangata Attorneys in November, commissioned by the Gauteng Department of Education, have not been made public. But GroundUp has seen a copy of the report, which says the behaviour of Deputy Principal Simon Dhlamini drove the child to take his own life.
The report said Dhlamini had made homophobic remarks to Sibusiso after an altercation between him and another learner. Dhlamini had told Sibusiso that he could not be gay at school and should leave his âgayismâ in the township.
In a message to his mother Sibusiso had said he wanted to kill himself because of the bullying from Dhlamini. The message has been seen by GroundUp.
The investigators wrote in the report: âIt is the culmination of the bullying that Sibusiso suffered in class and the unfair, irresponsible reprimand that he endured in the hands of the deputy principal that drove him to opt to take his life.â
âWe find that allegations that Mr Dhlamini ill-treated, blasphemed and homophobically abused the deceased has merit. We further find that these utterances caused the death of the learner has merit as the deceased was subjected to verbal and very public reprimand of his sexual choice and orientation.â
They found that Dhlamini had previously bullied Mbatha and according to his mother had told the child that he had a head âlike Mangethes busâ (the local school bus).
They recommended that âMr. Dhlamini be charged by putting him on precautionary suspension and a charge sheet be served on him to appear before a disciplinary enquiry.â
While Dhlamini is named as the main culprit in the report, three other teachers are also named: the principal, Mandla Ncanwya; the head of department, Jabulile Goodness Dhlamini; and the class teacher, Zandile Aubrey Ngwenya. The report said Dlamini and Ngwenya had âfailed to follow the processes of reporting and did not treat the matter with the necessary attention it needed.â
âWe recommend that the two educators be charged and/or subjected to disciplinary hearing,â the investigators said.
They also recommended that disciplinary action be taken against the learner who had an altercation with Sibusiso, for âserious misconductâ and against the principal, Ncanwya, for failing to protect Sibusiso and breaching the Employment of Educators Act. The principal was found to have lied in his interview saying he was not present on the day of the incident, when the CCTV video footage showed him to be there, the report said. âHe seemed less interested, and to some extent condoned the behaviour of his deputy principal and protected him.â
Sibusiso Mbatha. Photo supplied by his family
The report frequently cites and quotes the South African Constitution. âIt is important to take note that section 28(1 )(d) of the Constitution provides the child, regardless of his/her colour, creed, gender, social status, the right not to be maltreated, neglected, abused or degraded,â it states. Later it says, âNo provision in the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, as stated in section 2, allows anyone to deny gay and lesbian people ⊠in an institution, including school, the right to be who they are.â
Xolani Mkwende, spokesperson for Education MEC Matome Chiloane , told GroundUp that only Dhlamini had left the school. âEveryone is still reporting at school, except the Deputy Principal who was directly fingered by the report. The Deputy is reporting at the district.â
âHe is on precautionary suspensionâ.
The family has filed a civil case against the department, which is yet to reach the courts, their attorney Claryn Ferreira said. She said there is merit in the civil case because the report states that the school is liable because the family suffered âemotional shock and the loss of the sonâ, and that the department is liable for gross misconduct.
Sibusisoâs aunt Khanyisile Shongwe said the childâs mother, Mpumelelo Mbatha, âis not coping at all ⊠She still struggles to sleep without sleeping medication. She hasnât been able to go to the bathroom where he hanged himself.â
âEverything triggers her. She is really not okayâ.
Asked whether the school had a policy to deal with bullying, Mkwende said: âThe school is required to recite the preamble of the Constitution. The school has a Code of Conduct policy which is clear to both parents and learners which they sign to respect the dignity of other learners. Similarly, there are employment contracts for teachers. This addresses both bullying and homophobia.â
But according to the investigation report, Rachel Mazibuko, chairperson of the School Governing Body, had âconfirmed that the school does not have a policy that deals with bullying. Furthermore, although the school has a learnerâs code of conduct, it has not been updated for over two years.â
Mkwende also confirmed that the school has no guidance counsellor, only what is called âlearner supportâ.
Asked to comment on the BR Rangata report, Gauteng education department spokesperson Steve Mabona said the department could not comment because the report was âsubject to court processesâ.
We asked the Department of Education if we could get a direct response from Mr Dhlamini but were told: âWe speak on behalf of the department and employees as such he cannot comment.â
Support independent journalism
Donate using Payfast
© 2024 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.
We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.